https://copblaster.com/ The latest police officers, prosecutors, and judges put on blast using Cop Blaster. Hello Fellow Blasters, I am publicly sharing my story for the first time in hopes of gaining some outside support, to be a support for others, and most of all, to expose the disgusting and criminal behaviors of the Kern County Sheriff's Department. I have been dealing with cyber hacking, drone harassment, and stalking by the Kern County Sheriff's Department for more than a year and a half after filing a complaint with Internal Affairs. After finding out that my next door neighbor, who had just become a sheriff's deputy, had been spying on me and illegally hacking all of my electronic devices, including my Ring cameras and my Direct TV services, I reported him to Internal Affairs. I was terrified after realizing the extent of his behavior and the level of privacy invasion because I am a single women who lived alone. I did not know about the corruption that has been associated with the Kern County Sheriff's Department, but I wish that I had because my life took a turn for the worst and has not been the same since. After reporting the deputy, the hacking did not stop, no matter how much I tried to protect my privacy and secure my electronic devices, it just became worse. There was some type of device that was placed on my roof and it followed my everywhere I went inside the house. The drone harassment started and has not stopped. I had to sale my home and move in with my best friend, but the drone harassment followed me to her home. They have now hacked her devices and fly the drones directly over the house and even in the front yard. They use the drones to peep through the windows, and even follow me to the bathroom. They have been hovering for months now and they wait for me to come outside in an attempt to cause psychological distress. They follow me every where I go. The drones are positioned on each side of the house and they use EMF to target my body and cause bioelectric disturbances that feel like intense vibrations and pulsations. They do this on an hourly and daily basis. I have contacted every local, state, and federal law enforcement agency responsible for this type of corruption but it has been almost impossible to get anyone to listen or to help. I contacted an attorney and a PI, however, they charged me $8,000 and did nothing. I have recently applied for a passport because I do not feel safe anywhere in California and I feel as if moving again might be my only option. My heart goes out to anyone who has experienced something like this. Stay strong and live in your truth because what is done in darkness will always be revealed by the light of God. #deputymisconduct #dronestalkingandharassment #cybercrimes ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/police-officer.png https://copblaster.com/blast/64479/kern-county-deputy-misconduct Police County Sat, 13 Jun 2026 00:51:15 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/64479/kern-county-deputy-misconduct https://copblaster.com/blast/64479/kern-county-deputy-misconduct KernCounty'sNotSoFinestPredators en-us On Sunday March 15th, 2026 in Urbana, Ohio I was cleaning up my backyard. It was a pleasantly warm early spring day and I was getting my yard prepared to mow the grass for the first time this year. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to me, a "Karen" called 911 emergency dispatch alleging that "horrendous smoke" was coming from my fenced in gated backyard. Still unaware, the cops, responding to the "Karen" complaint apparently arrived at 321 Freeman Ave which is about 100 yards south of my residence. Their cruiser was parked in the single lane of traffic just south of 321 Freeman blocking all traffic on the 300 block of Freeman ave. The police left their parked cruiser blocking the single lane of travel without emergency or takedown lights on. The Urbana fire department rolled up to the corner of Freeman Ave and Ward st blocking Ward st. The fire department also blocked all lane of travel as a heavy rescue truck and a heavy duty four wheel drive was parked blocking all traffic and no emergency lights were on. Still unaware of all this, A fireman came to the front door of my residence and my wife answered the door and erroneously thinking that she didn't have anything to hide gave the fireman permission to enter my back yard. At this time the fireman came around my residence and opened the gate to my privacy fenced in backyard. I was standing by my fire pit, constructed of a steel fire ring and concrete pavers in all direction more than 25 feet from the back of my residence. I heard my gate open and observed the fireman attempting to enter my curtilage of my home. I immediately responded yelling at the fireman to "Get the hell out of my yard". The fireman responded, "I have permission" and continued to enter my yard. I told the fireman, "You don't have my permission". I went to the choke point of my yard and stood attempting to block the fireman further entry into my yard. While this happened I continuously asserted my constitutional rights loudly and demanded they exit my yard on the grounds that I terminated their illegal entry into my yard. Soon, this fireman was joined by two more fireman and two Urbana police officer, Ofc. Stacy and Ofc. Hurst. My wife also came out of the back door of my residence and tried to calm me down as I was loudly protested Urbana government illegal intrusion into my yard. As I seen that Urbana government did not heed my demands to leave my yard but instead continued to pour into my yard and total disregard of my constitutional rights. Seeing that I was having no effect to stop this intrusion into my yard I treid to get my wife to go into the house and retrieve my cellphone so I can record the Urbana government illegally in my yard. Upon return to my backyard I walked out to my fire pit around Ofc Hurst to my fire pit standing on the east side of the fire pit I began to attempt to record this illegal and egregious violations of my constitutional rights. At this time Ofc. Stacy and Ofc. Hurst begin taking up attack positions around me. As I attempted to record the violations of the Urbana government. Ofc. Hurst then started threatening me with disorderly conduct if I don't stop protesting their illegal behaviour. As I hit the button on my phone to record, Ofc. Hurst hit my hand knocking my phone from my hand and violently assaulted me along with Ofc. Stacy placing under arrest on my private property for disorderly conduct ORC 2917.11(A)(2)(E)(1)(c). I was forcibly hand cuffed and taken from my back yard by both police officers and perp walked the entire block and placed into the police cruiser and taken to a holding cell at Urbana police department. My wife bonded me out for $250.00 plus fees totalling about $264.00. There was no exigent circumstances to justify Urbana governments actions as they had to obtain consent to enter my yard. #policebrutality #falsearrest #trespass #criminaltrespass #assault ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/Thumbnail-1.png https://copblaster.com/blast/64476/the-urbana-zone-episode-1 Police City Fri, 05 Jun 2026 23:53:37 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/64476/the-urbana-zone-episode-1 https://copblaster.com/blast/64476/the-urbana-zone-episode-1 BoomerDown1956 en-us Daniel Barber of San Francisco was recently arrested for allegedly threatening Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents after he sent his honest opinion of the agency to Acting Director Todd Lyons. The email of Barber's opinions released following his arrest stops short of containing "true threats" under the law despite his stated homicidal wishes. Barber also clearly stated "that is not a threat" before explaining "but simply my opinion" which no reasonable person would interpret as an intention to engage homicidal violence himself. The first opinion Barker is accused of sending to Lyons was "YOUR GESTAPO NAZI MAGGOT ICE AGENTS SHOULD BE TERRIFIED." Of course they "should be terrified" because they've pissed off most of the country. That is clearly a statement of opinion. To qualify as a threat he would have to say something indicating imminent bodily harm like "agents should be terrified because I am going to put an end to them once and for all." That kind of statement which I am only using as an example is the kind of thing the government typically needs to obtain a valid threat conviction. Simply calling them maggots and saying they "should be terrified" does not meet the threshold of a criminal threat under federal law. The next opinion Barber is accused of sending to Lyons was "EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM DESERVES TO BE ARRESTED BY ARMED AMERICAN CITIZENS, FROGMARCHED INTO THE STREETS, SUMMARILY TRIED AND CONVICTED OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY THERE IN PUBLIC, AND SUBSEQUENTLY EXECUTED RIGHT THERE AS WELL WITH TWO FKING BULLETS TO THE BACK OF THEIR MAGGOT NAZI HEADS!" That is also a statement of opinion. He is not saying that he or any other American citizen is going to arrest ICE agents, hold a trial, and execute them. He is simply expressing his true honest opinion that ICE agents should be rounded up and shot. I said the same thing about all federal agents years ago because in my opinion every federal law enforcement officer deserved to be rounded up, put on trial as traitors for violating their oath to the Constitution, and executed so that they may swiftly be replaced by people loyal to the Constitution until proven otherwise in which case the process repeats. My logical opinion was that the current government is so far gone that we're best hitting the reset button. I had a First Amendment right to say that and if I feel like saying it again in the future I reserve the right to do so. Finally, prayer is not a crime. Therefore, Baber's promise that he will be "praying daily to the universe that Americans start rising up" is not illegal. Everyone has the right to pray for dead Feds and tell the Feds they're doing so without fear of being arrested for sharing their prayers with them. I am not a religious man but this case makes me want to go down to my local ICE building with a sign that says "Pray for Dead Feds" on one side and "God Hates Feds" on the other. #immigration #danielbarber #toddlyons #falsearrest ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/daniel-barber-opinion.jpg https://copblaster.com/blast/63475/anti-ice-opinions-land-spirited-writer-daniel-barber-in-jail Police Federal Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:47:29 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63475/anti-ice-opinions-land-spirited-writer-daniel-barber-in-jail https://copblaster.com/blast/63475/anti-ice-opinions-land-spirited-writer-daniel-barber-in-jail CopBlaster.com en-us Best Western Plus Peppertree Inn, Omak Washington Also known as Jeanette Mickelow, Jeanette Payton Jeanette Payton Robinson is a hard core drug addict & alcoholic, a well known sex addict, compulsive thief, manipulative liar, and she stole money out of out luggage at the hotel. She talked all kind of nice chatting behavior with my family and I. Then she got too chatty and started gossiping about children who were abused by old men in her home town of Vanderhooof BC. Obviously she didn't know that we were from that area and knew who she was talking about. Why does this hotel hire these sorts of people. Jeanette Mickelow is a brutal malicious gossip, My husband and I reported Jeanette Payton Robinson to the Best Western management. She enjoys supporting abusive men while gossiping and laughing at children who are sexually abused by old men. Jeanette Payton Robinson is a disgusting wretch. #assault#predator#abuse#vanderhoof ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/Screenshot (8)aacb.png https://copblaster.com/blast/63472/jeanette-payton-robinson Corrections Halfway House Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:44:40 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63472/jeanette-payton-robinson https://copblaster.com/blast/63472/jeanette-payton-robinson Kelsjenn19 en-us Detective Boliek was fired for misconduct lies and other things the county is not bringing this to face they are worried more victims will come out i know i was a victim of this man and i know there is another man in jail fighting his freedom for lies and he is innocent we need more victims more people to come forward with this Beaverton police officer he needs to be known is there anyone out there that went to jail did time for a crime they didn't do? or their police report had lies on it? did you ever experience or a love one experience any kind of wrong with this detective? i need to get this out i need others to tell their story so we can get justice this detective did things he shouldn't done to innocent people and it needs to come forward i want justice for what he pulled on me and others. he is a crooked cop well was he isn't a cop anymore but we can get justice I'm a felon but now in recovery this Detective haunts me daily he did me wrong and he done others wrong any kind of issue or anything you experience with this cop that wasn't right wasn't fair let me know i want anything on him #detectivemichealboliek ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/micheal boliek.jpg https://copblaster.com/blast/63465/detective-micheal-boliek-guilty-for-misconduct-lies Police City Sun, 12 Apr 2026 15:08:48 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63465/detective-micheal-boliek-guilty-for-misconduct-lies https://copblaster.com/blast/63465/detective-micheal-boliek-guilty-for-misconduct-lies justice81 en-us Former Pettis County Sheriff's Deputy Jordan Daniel Schutte, who murdered Hannah Fizer in 2020, was indicted this past week by a Pettis County grand jury on charges of possessing child pornography and distribution of child pornography in the first degree. He is currently being held in the Miller County Jail on $75,000 bail on behalf of Pettis County where he will likely be transferred in the near future. Such charges seem consistent with what is known of former Deputy Schutte's character. DISGUSTING CHARGES The charges against the Schutte formerly known as Deputy are disgusting. They allege that he knowingly distributed a video depicting a young boy under the age of 14 engaged in sexual conduct and possessed an image of a male minor under the age of 18 masturbating. You can view the entire PDF by clicking the PDF link above this article. To save you the time here are both counts word for word: COUNT 1 The Grand Jurors of Pettis County, Missouri, charge that the defendant, in violation of Section 573.037, RSMo, committed the class B felony of possession of child pornography, punishable upon conviction under Sections 573.037 and 558.011, RSMo, in that on or about June 16, 2025, in the County of Pettis, State of Missouri, the defendant knowingly possessed child pornography that was a visual depiction of a person less than eighteen years of age engaged in sexually explicit conduct, consisting of a moving image or video of male minor child masturbating. COUNT 2 The Grand Jurors of Pettis County, Missouri, charge that the defendant, in violation of Section 573.025, RSMo, committed the class B felony of promoting child pornography in the first degree, punishable under Sections 558.011 and 573.025, RSMo, in that on or about June 16, 2025, in the County of Pettis, State of Missouri, the defendant, knowing its content and character, provided, published and/or disseminated obscene material consisting of a visual depiction of a male child that appears to be less than fourteen years of age engaged in sexual conduct. Conclusion A murderer and a pedophile. This is a developing story with more coming soon... #jordanschutte #hannahfizer #childpornography #sexoffenders ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/jordan-schutte-mugshot.jpg https://copblaster.com/blast/63453/former-pettis-county-deputy-jordan-schutte-indicted-for-child-porn Police County Mon, 02 Feb 2026 11:31:14 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63453/former-pettis-county-deputy-jordan-schutte-indicted-for-child-porn https://copblaster.com/blast/63453/former-pettis-county-deputy-jordan-schutte-indicted-for-child-porn CopBlaster.com en-us I have 5 years worth of evidence on the Garfield County Sheriffs department and the 9the judicial branch and DHS/APS department. I am currently residing at a safe house in Utah because of these sheriffs. Its unbelievable what they did to me and my children. They stole my entire life. Destroyed it. I have been running from them since 2023. They committed so many crimes on me. Cyber crimes, violent crimes, allowed so many crimes yo happen to me #misconduct #corruption #stalking ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/police-officer.png https://copblaster.com/blast/63451/sheriffs-department Police County Fri, 30 Jan 2026 02:06:12 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63451/sheriffs-department https://copblaster.com/blast/63451/sheriffs-department Id.theft25@proton.me en-us On the night of June 3, 2025 Officer Matthew Charles Panagakis Serial # 44976 Badge # 25617 repeatedly attacked his now ex-girlfriend at his former apartment complex in Marina Del Rey. Neighbors witnessed and overheard the abuse and contacted 911 while one man intervened. Panagakis fled the scene and contacted his fellow co-worker Nazario Ruiz and the two concocted a fake story so that he could claim false innocence. Panagakis went in his home and scratched himself all over his body and claimed that the cuts were from his now ex girlfriend and that he was merely defending himself. He was arrested and an emergency protective order was granted for her. He tried to request his own EPO but the judge saw through his lies and denied his request. Following the incident was a hearing for a permanent restraining order in which Panagakis attempted to bribe witnesses to make up a false narrative of what happened that evening. Despite trying to lie his way through, a restraining order was granted against him but the judge admitted off record to having a bias towards him so he let him off with a one year as opposed to a 5 year restraining order. He was investigated by IA but threatened to sue. He has since tried to file three false police reports on his ex girlfriend out of retaliation but none of them have stuck. #domesticviolence ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/IMG_0814.jpg https://copblaster.com/blast/63447/matthew-charles-panagakis-woman-beater Police City Mon, 05 Jan 2026 22:17:32 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63447/matthew-charles-panagakis-woman-beater https://copblaster.com/blast/63447/matthew-charles-panagakis-woman-beater Pizzaslopes en-us Maricopa County, AZ Arizona's family court system has seen dysfunction before, but Judge Charlene Jackson has turned judicial misconduct into an art form. Her March 2025 restraining order against a protective mother wasn't a legal filing it was a retaliatory manifesto dripping with bias, contradictions, and self-incrimination. It didn't protect anyone. It exposed her. Erin Gerlach exhausted every lawful avenue to protect her daughter, Brooklyn, from documented abuse. And what did she get? A judge who couldn't even establish jurisdiction properly, yet issued ruling after ruling like she was above the Constitution. Jackson ignored evidence like it was optional, tossed out procedure like it was inconvenient, and treated Gerlach's case like a personal grudge match. Her courtroom wasn't a place for justice , it was a stage for unchecked ego, where a mothers attempt to shield her child was not only dismissed, but criminalized and weaponized against her. According to Gerlach, this wasn't a custody dispute. It was a legal ambush. The law wasn't applied, it was twisted, weaponized, and used to silence a mother who dared to challenge the system. And the system? It didn't just fail. It helped. Meth, Molestation, and Misconduct: The Charlene Jackson Docket Jacksons rulings read like a dystopian script. She awarded custody to a father indicted for molesting his own children in another state. She granted sole legal decision-making to a parent who tested positive for several substances including methamphetamine, colluding with an attorney to conceal the drug test results from the other parent. The buried lab report only surfaced when a parent advocacy group reviewed the case file and discovered the concealed evidence. In one of the most appalling and indefensible rulings to ever come out of Maricopa County's family court, Judge Charlene Jackson granted unsupervised visitation to a man who was not the biological father of a non-verbal, special needs child, despite overwhelming evidence that the child was the victim of ongoing sexual assault. Law enforcement uncovered hundreds, possibly thousands, of sexually explicit images of this child and other minors in the mans possession, triggering a criminal investigation. Yet, Jackson still forced the NON-VERBAL child into regular phone contact with his abuser, while forcing the child to have unsupervised visitation with him. This wasn't just judicial negligence, it was cruelty. Jackson also denied a motion to continue a scheduled court date, despite being provided a letter from a doctor stating that the child required urgent medical attention. As a result of being forced to prioritize the courts schedule over the child's healthcare needs, the necessary medical procedure was delayed, leading to a long-term medical complication that could have been prevented. There are dozens of similar cases we could list. This is just a typical Tuesday for Jackson, whose biased rulings reflect a documented pattern of ignoring credible evidence, disregarding child safety, and punishing protective parents who dare to challenge abuse. Her courtroom has become a place where due process is sidelined and vulnerable children are placed at risk. This is not just misconduct. Its institutional betrayal, an embarrassment to Arizona's Judiciary and its happening in plain sight. The Filing That Lit a Fire On March 24, 2025, Judge Jackson filed a personal restraining order against Gerlach, citing eight alleged incidents of harassment between November 18, 2023 and November 12, 2024. That entire timeframe overlaps with Jacksons active role as the judge presiding over Gerlach's custody case. The case was finally reassigned November 12, 2024, within hours of Gerlach presenting evidence of Jacksons misconduct to the Arizona Supreme Court. If Jackson truly believed she was being harassed, judicial ethics required her to recuse herself, not continue issuing rulings, including one-word denials of Gerlach's motions and an order requiring her to pay the opposing parties attorneys fees while she was self-represented at that time. In her restraining order application, Jackson acknowledged that Gerlach's social media accounts had been deleted or made private as of November 2024. Yet, she waited until March 2025, four months later, to file the order. The delay in filing, combined with the fact that the restraining order was submitted on the same day and at the same location as the opposing party in Gerlach's custody case, has added to speculation about Jacksons true motives behind the filing. This timing has also intensified existing allegations that Judge Jackson and the opposing party may have acted as co-conspirators throughout the case to deprive Gerlach of her rights. Judge Jackson didn't just file a restraining order; she filed a confession. In her attempt to muzzle a protective mother, she made sworn statements under penalty of perjury that do more damage to her own credibility than any critic ever could. Its like she walked into court, threw her own ethics into the trash, lit her integrity on fire, and said, Here's more proof I shouldn't be on the bench. She wanted to play victim, but instead she played herself. Filing in her personal capacity stripped her of judicial immunity, and now those statements are fair game. She wanted to intimidate Gerlach into silence. Instead, she handed the public a smoking gun. The restraining order isn't protection, its projection. Jacksons filing didn't silence anyone; it lit a fire. Her own words, now on record, contradict her rulings, expose her bias, and validate the very misconduct she's been accused of. She didn't just tell on herself; she gift-wrapped the evidence and signed it under oath. The best part? She dragged her co-conspirators under the bus with her. What Jackson characterizes as harassment is, in reality, lawful advocacy, protected by the Constitution, supported by public records, and rooted in lived experience. Gerlach's actions reflect a civic duty to speak out against injustice and stand up for what is right, along with her duty as a mother to protect all children, including her own. Family Ties and False Denials: The Paige Jackson Cover-Up One of the most brazen contradictions in Jacksons sworn statements involves her own niece, Paige Jackson. In her restraining order, Jackson categorically denied ever presiding over a case involving Paige. But screenshots from the official Maricopa County Superior Court docket tell a different story, one that's now fueling allegations of perjury and conflict of interest. Supporting Evidence: A screenshot from the Maricopa County Superior Court docket lists the Judicial officer assigned to Paige Jacksons case as Judge Charlene Jackson, contradicting Jacksons sworn denials. A growing number of litigants are sounding the alarm over missing or manipulated audio recordings from hearings presided over by Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Charlene Jackson. The common denominator? The For The Record (FTR) system the official courtroom audio platform was allegedly muted, trimmed, or mysteriously erased during pivotal moments of testimony and judicial rulings. In her restraining order filing, Jackson tried to deflect from the accusation, stating: She accused me of intentionally muting the recording system in the courtroom even though I do not control the recording system in the courtroom. But that denial hasn't held up under scrutiny. Motions, affidavits, and formal complaints from unrelated cases describe eerily similar incidents, suggesting that Gerlach's experience wasn't an outlier, but part of a broader pattern. Attorneys and litigants have documented instances where FTR recordings were incomplete, abruptly cut off, or missing entirely. In one case, Jackson allegedly stated she had a personal interest in resolving the matter. When the litigant and their attorney requested the audio, the final two minutes, where Jacksons statement was made, had been erased or trimmed. Gerlach's case is particularly damning. She accused Jackson of muting the FTR system at the start of a hearing in which Jackson openly stated she had intentionally placed a jurisdictional ruling in a non-appealable minute entry, effectively blocking Gerlach from challenging the decision. Jackson then proceeded with the hearing and issued orders, despite having already been served with a Notice of Appeal, which legally divested her of jurisdiction. That portion of the FTR record is missing. When Gerlach contacted court security, she was told the footage from the courtroom was unavailable. She documented the incident in pleadings filed directly into Jacksons division. Jackson never responded to the allegations until she filed the retaliatory restraining order. And the pattern doesn't end there. In another documented case, Jackson denied a motion to continue a contempt trial for a seriously ill attorney not based on law, but on what she described as a gut reaction. She dismissed the attorneys documented illness as fortuitous, implying it was a delay tactic. The attorney was forced to represent a litigant for a contempt trial while visibly ill, taking multiple breaks during proceedings. Jackson refused to allow co-counsel to speak or participate, leaving the litigant without adequate representation and violating her right to due process When Gerlach publicly accused Jackson of issuing rulings based on gut feelings, Jackson denied this ever happening, called Gerlach a liar and claimed Gerlach's accusation amounted to harassment. But public records, including a Motion for a Change of Judge (which was granted) filed by a well-respected attorney, confirm that Jackson did, in fact, cite her gut reaction as the basis for denying the continuance. The same motion documents Jacksons refusal to accommodate the ill attorney and her decision to proceed despite clear medical evidence. That motion is a matter of public record which Gerlach obtained and submitted as evidence. Supporting Evidence: Affidavit filed under oath confirming the final two minutes of an FTR recording were erased or trimmed. The Warrant Lie: Jacksons False Claim Under Oath and the Trauma She Authorized In her restraining order filing, Judge Charlene Jackson made a bold and verifiably false statement under penalty of perjury and while identifying herself as a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge: She claims I have issued warrants for arrest which is untrue as I have issued 1 warrant in my career as a superior court judge. That wasn't just a distortion. It was a flat-out lie, delivered under oath, while portraying herself as a victim of harassment in order to commit harassment herself. Court records directly contradict Jacksons sworn statement. Not only has she issued multiple warrants in unrelated cases, but she signed more than one warrant specifically in Gerlach's case. Gerlach has produced a redacted copy of one such warrant bearing Jacksons signature as proof that Jacksons denial isn't just inaccurate, its a documented falsehood. And the consequences weren't theoretical. One of those warrants was executed over Christmas break, resulting in the violent removal of children from their home. SWAT officers arrived with guns drawn. Children were ripped from their parents in what Jackson knew was not a true emergency. The trauma inflicted in that moment will last a lifetime. What makes this even more egregious is that in this particular case, Jackson had already been served with a mandate from the Arizona Court of Appeals divesting her of jurisdiction. She was legally barred from issuing further orders. But she did it anyway, including issuing warrants, continuing hearings, and ignoring appellate authority as if the law didn't apply to her. This isn't just judicial overreach. Its a judge operating outside her legal bounds, lying under oath, and inflicting irreversible harm on families. And she did it using taxpayer-funded resources, diverting law enforcement from real emergencies to enforce retaliatory orders that lacked legal standing. That's not just misconduct. Its abuse of power with public consequences including egregious waste of taxpayer funds. And now, thanks to the paper trail she tried to deny, the evidence is catching up. Supporting Evidence: A redacted copy of a warrant issued by Judge Charlene D. Jackson with her signature Judge Jacksons Restraining Order Reads Like a Confession And Critics aren't Backing Down In her restraining order filing, Judge Charlene Jackson rattled off a laundry list of accusations she claims Gerlach made against her, ranging from destruction of evidence and witness intimidation to election fraud, impersonation, and conspiracy to commit child abuse. Jacksons exact words: Defendant accused me of destruction of evidence, witness intimidation, extortion, perjury, violation of civil rights, conspiracy to commit child abuse and child endangerment, collusion with court-appointed providers, allowing litigants to submit fraudulent evidence, election fraud, election interference, colluding with the judicial nominating committee and judicial performance review, destruction of or concealing public records, filing false disclosures, lying on her application for appointment, providing false instruments for filing, numerous conspiracy charges, stealing someone's LinkedIn profile and impersonating them online, issuing warrants knowing the affidavits were falsified, and abusing her power over gut feelings and misconduct in office. Its a dramatic list, but here's the problem: Gerlach has never denied making those accusations. In fact, She stands by every one of them and she's backed them with a growing body of corroborating evidence, including sworn affidavits, court filings, victim testimony, courtroom recordings, and public records that paint a damning portrait of Jacksons conduct on the bench. These weren't offhand remarks. Gerlach submitted her accusations formally, through motions and affidavits filed directly in Jacksons courtroom over the course of nearly two years. Jackson read them. She presided over the case. And she responded with nothing more than blanket denials. And that's where Jacksons credibility collapses. If she truly believed Gerlach's accusations were harassing, defamatory, or improper, why did she allow them to continue for nearly two years? Why did she wait until after the fact, then reframe those same accusations as harassment in a retaliatory restraining order? Jacksons attempt to retroactively criminalize protected legal speech isn't just hypocritical, its procedurally indefensible. And Gerlach isn't alone. Letters submitted to Governor Katie Hobbs, Attorney General Kris Mayes and a petition for federal investigation have echoed Gerlach's claims. These sources cite Jacksons pattern of issuing rulings without hearings, suppressing critical evidence, placing children in the custody of their abusers, demonstrating bias, retaliating against litigants who file complaints, failing to follow Arizona Rules of Family Law Procedure, violating Constitutional Rights, and enabling custody outcomes based on perjury and fraud. One affidavit even documents Jackson issuing warrants despite knowing the supporting affidavits contained false statements. These sources cite Jacksons pattern of issuing rulings without hearings, suppressing critical evidence, retaliating against litigants who file complaints, and enabling custody outcomes based on perjury and fraud. One affidavit even documents Jackson issuing warrants despite knowing the supporting affidavits contained false statements. Jacksons strategy appears to be simple: deny everything, label critics as conspiracy theorists, and hope the paper trail disappears. But it hasn't. And the more she tries to discredit Gerlach, the more her own rulings, filings, and contradictions validate the allegations. This isn't just a he-said-she-said. Its a judge under fire, facing a chorus of documented complaints, and trying to rewrite the narrative and silence a protective mother with a restraining order. But the evidence isn't cooperating. And neither is the public. Arizona Judges Are Public Officials. Their Misconduct Is Not a Private Matter. Gerlach had every right to believe and publicly reference the Phoenix New Times article dated December 22, 2022, which quoted Judge Charlene Jackson directly. In that piece, Jackson identified herself as both a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge and an attorney representing the Hualapai Tribe near Kingman confirming her dual roles in her own words. This wasn't hearsay. It was a public admission. Upon reviewing Rule 3.10 of the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct, Gerlach reasonably concluded that Jacksons conduct violated judicial ethics: A judge shall not practice law. A judge may act pro se and may, without compensation, give legal advice to and draft or review documents for a member of the judges family. The rule is unequivocal: sitting judges are prohibited from practicing law, no exceptions for side work, tribal representation, or consulting. The restriction exists to preserve impartiality, prevent conflicts of interest, and maintain public trust in the judiciary. Jacksons decision to engage in legal practice while holding judicial office was a breach of the very code she's sworn to uphold. And because she disclosed it in a public article, she cannot accuse Gerlach, or anyone else, of harassment for citing it. Gerlach's statements were based on publicly available facts and a reasonable interpretation of the law. Judges Are Public Officials Under Arizona Law Under the First Amendment and the Arizona Constitution, criticism of a judges conduct, especially when based on public records, court filings, or published articles is not defamation or harassment, but protected speech. As public officials, they are subject to greater scrutiny, reduced expectations of privacy, and broader protections for public criticism under the First Amendment. Calling out misconduct backed by public record and ethical rules is not harassment. Its protected speech. Its accountability that's long overdue. How Is Judge Jackson Still on the Bench? Lets call it what it is: a systemic failure of accountability. The evidence against Jackson includes false statements under oath, abuse of judicial authority, retaliatory filings, and constitutional violations affecting children and families. So why is she still presiding over cases involving vulnerable litigants? How does a judge who fabricates allegations, weaponizes restraining orders to silence lawful dissent, and disregards due process still hold a gavel? The answer is as disturbing as the question: Arizona's judicial oversight mechanisms are broken. And every day Jackson remains on the bench, the risk to families grows and so does Arizona's liability. Attorneys, advocates, and affected parents are demanding a transparent, independent review of Jacksons fitness to serve. The calls for disciplinary action, and independent criminal investigation are growing. Retaliation Backfired: Now the Receipts Are Rolling In Judge Jackson may have thought her restraining order would silence scrutiny. Instead, it detonated it. Gerlach and other parents aren't just speaking out, they're armed with receipts: documentation, transcripts, sworn affidavits, and evidence that hasnt even been made public yet. What's already out there is just the tip of the iceberg. Her attempt to silence victims has backfired spectacularly, drawing critical attention not only to her own conduct but to the broader dysfunction of the Maricopa County Family Court. The floodgates are open. And the public is watching. If Jackson thought this was the end of the story, she's about to learn it was only the prologue. #judge #charlenejackson #maricopacounty #arizona #familycourt # ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/arizona family court has a lead arsonist judge charlene jackson.png https://copblaster.com/blast/63420/protect-arizonas-children-from-judge-charlene-jackson Judges County/State Fri, 12 Sep 2025 19:53:29 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63420/protect-arizonas-children-from-judge-charlene-jackson https://copblaster.com/blast/63420/protect-arizonas-children-from-judge-charlene-jackson k3xhyc4 en-us A Young Life Lost, Overshadowed by Mismanagement On the night of November 2, 2024, Tripp Brazealesupported by a great family and stable home lifewas riding four-wheelers near Crow Creek in Forrest City, Arkansas, with family members and a friend. Officers from the St. Francis County Sheriffs Office, including Deputy Alvin Merle Bynum and Sgt. David Kinney, were nearby responding to another call. What should have been a routine interaction turned tragic when Tripp fled from Deputy Bynum and ran into the woods around 12:42 AM on November 3. After Tripp fled, what happened next remains a mystery. Deputy Bynums body camerawhich should have provided crucial documentationwas turned off at the end of the pursuit. For the next 49 minutes, there is no footage. The camera only came back on once the truck and trailer arrived to load the ATV for transport back to the sheriffs office. This gap erases the most critical period of the incidentwhat happened after Tripp ran into the woods. At 1:21 AM, during that missing window, Tripp called his parents. In that call, he explained that he was just over the ridge and planned to walk toward the police lights to meet them. This demonstrates that he was alive, coherent, and trying to returndetails that are tragically overshadowed by procedural failures. Despite these red flags, Tripps death was ruled a suicide, as determined by law enforcement and the autopsy report. This ruling stands, yet the unanswered questions surrounding the investigation continue to haunt the family and the community. Putting It in Perspective: Suicide in Young People To fully appreciate how rare and heartbreaking this case is, heres some context: Suicide is the third leading cause of death for people ages 15 to 19, and the second leading cause for those ages 10 to 14 and 20 to 34 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK608166/) For male teenagers (ages 1519), the suicide rate is around 15 per 100,000, which is approximately 3 times higher than for female teens ( 5 per 100,000). (https://www.aecf.org/blog/teen-death-rates) From 2007 to 2021, suicide rates for those aged 10 to 24 increased from 6.8 to 11.0 deaths per 100,000. (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db471.htm) Though rural areasincluding parts of Arkansasoften experience higher suicide rates, Arkansas had an overall age-adjusted rate of 18.0 per 100,000 in 2022, compared to the national average of 14.2. (https://usafacts.org/answers/how-many-people-die-by-suicide/state/arkansas/) These figures show that, while adolescence is a period of elevated risk, suicide remains a relatively rare outcomeand certainly not one youd expect from someone with a strong support system and loving family like Tripp. Red Flags and Missing Accountability Lets tighten the focus on procedural failures, with the 49 minutes of missing bodycam footage spotlighted as a central failure: Critical Footage Gap: 49 minutes of body camera footage vanished between the end of the pursuit and the arrival of the truck and trailererasing the period when Tripp most needed oversight. Ignored Lifeline: Tripps 1:21 AM call revealed he was conscious, alive, and trying to returnyet this key piece of evidence was not incorporated in a timely or transparent way. Trust Eroded: A suicide ruling might have felt conclusive, but paired with missing footage and delayed evidence integration, it only deepened doubt in a family anchored by love and stability. A Call for Reform Tripp Brazeales death demands more than condolencesit demands systemic reform: Body cameras must be non-negotiable: Gaps like the 49 minutes of missing footage in Tripps case erase the truth. Cameras should remain on, with strict consequences when they are not. Evidence must guide investigations: A phone call proving a young man was alive and trying to return should never be brushed aside. Accountability cannot be optional: Officers who leave an agency should not be able to walk away from responsibility. Transparency must be standard practice: Families deserve facts, not silence. Communities deserve truth, not suspicion. Conclusion The loss of Tripp Brazeale is devastating. His death was ruled a suicide by law enforcement and the autopsy, yet critical details raise doubts that cannot be ignored. The 49 minutes of missing body camera footage erased the most important window of timewhat happened after he ran into the woods. Meanwhile, his 1:21 AM phone call shows he was alive, coherent, and making his way back. These facts dont align with the portrait of a troubled young man. Tripp had a strong, loving family, a good home life, and the support system many young people at risk of suicide lack. That reality, paired with the investigations failures, is what makes this case so painful for those who knew and loved himand so concerning for the broader community. Justice is not optional. Without reform, other families will face the same silence, the same gaps, and the same heartbreak. Tripps story demands that law enforcement rise to the standard of truth, accountability, and transparencybecause no family should ever be left in the dark about the fate of their child. C. Moore #justicefortripp #Arkansas #truecrimestories #accountability #praesidiumsolutions #investigationtruth #SpeakUp #stfranciscounty #ForrestCityAR #TruthForTripp #truecrimecommunity #corruptcopsjusticefortripp ]]> https://copblaster.com/uploads/images/police-officer.png https://copblaster.com/blast/63416/justice-for-tripp-brazeale-st-francis-county-corrupt-cops Police County Thu, 21 Aug 2025 19:29:05 GMT https://copblaster.com/blast/63416/justice-for-tripp-brazeale-st-francis-county-corrupt-cops https://copblaster.com/blast/63416/justice-for-tripp-brazeale-st-francis-county-corrupt-cops KRiggs12 en-us